Thursday, February 29, 2024

The Sands of Arrakis Beckon Again: Dune Part Two Unveiled

Tonight, for me and a few millions aficionados, the desert planet of Arrakis comes alive once more in the highly anticipated sequel to Denis Villeneuve's epic adaptation of Frank Herbert's masterpiece, Dune: Part Two. After the groundbreaking success of the first installment, expectations are sky-high, and from what I've gathered, the sequel is set to not only meet but exceed them.

Dune: Part One left us on the brink of monumental change, with Paul Atreides (Timothée Chalamet) stepping into his destiny among the Fremen of Arrakis. Part Two promises to dive deeper into the political intrigue, the battle for the control of the spice mélange, and Paul's journey towards becoming the prophesied Muad'Dib. The storyline is expected to explore themes of power, betrayal, and destiny, with a focus on the complex dynamics between the Atreides (what's left of them), the Harkonnens (Feyd-Rautha Harkonnen), and the native Fremen (looking forward to seeing more of their way of life showcased). It's this intricate narrative, combined with the breathtaking landscape of Arrakis, that sets the stage for a cinematic experience of epic proportions.

At the helm of this interstellar voyage is Denis Villeneuve, a director renowned for his ability to blend profound storytelling with visual grandeur - and also a native of Québec, my home province. Villeneuve's direction in the first part was nothing short of masterful (was anyone surprised), and his vision for Part Two is one of the most anticipated aspects of the sequel. His ability to bring Herbert's dense and complex world to life, while maintaining a deep emotional core, has been widely praised, and there's little doubt that he will continue to weave his magic in this next chapter.

No discussion of Dune would be complete without mentioning Hans Zimmer's score. Zimmer, a maestro of film music (Interstellar, Gladiator, Inception, etc.), has crafted a soundscape that is as vast and mystifying as the deserts of Arrakis. His score for Part One was a groundbreaking achievement, and the sequel promises to further elevate the auditory experience, blending traditional orchestration with innovative sound design to immerse the audience in the world of Dune fully.

The visual effects (F/X) in Dune: Part Two are expected to be as groundbreaking as its predecessor, with the trailers teasing sequences of even greater scale and complexity. The first film set a high bar for visual storytelling, with its masterful use of CGI and practical effects to create the world of Arrakis. This time around, the F/X team, under Paul Lambert​'s direction, is expected to push the boundaries further, bringing to life the epic battles and the awe-inspiring sandworms with even more detail and realism.

As for the future of the Dune franchise, speculation is rife. With Part Two likely to cover the remainder of the first book, fans are eagerly discussing the possibility of Villeneuve tackling Dune Messiah - as he had indicated that he would not continue beyond a third film. Given his success with the franchise so far, the prospect of Villeneuve continuing to guide the saga is an exciting one - whether behind the camera or as an executive producer. His vision has redefined what epic science fiction cinema can be (Arrival, Blade Runner 2049), and the potential for further exploring the rich universe of Dune under his direction is a tantalizing prospect.

Dune: Part Two isn't just a movie to me, and to most Dune fans; it's an event. And hopefully the continuation of a whole new and fresh movie franchise. With its compelling storyline, Villeneuve's visionary direction, Zimmer's haunting score, and jaw-dropping F/X, the film is set to be a cinematic landmark. As I look to the future, the possibility of continuing this journey through the Dune saga with Villeneuve at the helm is a prospect that fills us with anticipation. 

So, grab your stillsuit and prepare to walk the sands of Arrakis once again - I'll be doing so tonight (minus the stillsuit of course!😆)

The universe of Dune awaits, and its mysteries are more compelling than ever.

Friday, February 09, 2024

Exploring the What-If: A Review of William Gibson's Unproduced 'Alien 3' Screenplay

Sigourney Weaver in Alien 3. Photograph: 20th Century

William Gibson's unproduced screenplay for "Alien 3" offers a narrative that diverges significantly from David Fincher's 1992 film, potentially providing a sequel that aligns more closely with the thematic and tonal elements established in "Alien" and "Aliens".

Gibson's script set the stage with the Sulaco entering a sector controlled by a cold war-esque Union of
Progressive Peoples (U.P.P.), whereupon Ripley, Newt, and an injured Hicks find themselves amidst a new set of challenges. Unlike Fincher's version, Gibson's screenplay maintains the survival and continuity of key characters from "Aliens," notably Bishop, Newt and Hicks, and introduces a plot revolving around the militarization and genetic modification of Xenomorphs.

One of the key aspects where Gibson's screenplay could have excelled over Fincher's "Alien 3" is in its extension of the action-oriented, ensemble-cast dynamics that James Cameron developed in "Aliens." Gibson’s narrative continuity with "Aliens" could have offered fans a more satisfying narrative bridge between the second and fourth films of the franchise. Additionally, the screenplay's exploration of themes such as cold war tensions and the dangers of bioweaponry could have added depth to the "Alien" universe, presenting a nuanced backdrop against which the horror and survival elements of the series could unfold.


Moreover, Gibson’s screenplay proposed a fresh take on the Xenomorph life cycle and the potential for human-Xenomorph hybrids, introducing new elements to the alien mythology that could have enriched the franchise's lore. This creative expansion upon the established Xenomorph biology could have provided a novel and terrifying twist on the alien threat, rejuvenating the franchise with new horror and science fiction elements.

However, it's worth noting that Gibson’s screenplay, while offering interesting narrative and thematic elements, also faced criticisms for potentially not deviating enough from the formula established by "Aliens" and for sidelining Ripley, a crucial character of the franchise. Despite these criticisms, the screenplay’s potential to combine the action and team dynamics of "Aliens" with new, thought-provoking themes could have resulted in a sequel that not only paid homage to its predecessors but also paved new ground for the series.

In comparison to the released "Alien 3," which took a more isolated and horror-centric approach by focusing on Ripley's struggle on a prison planet (and which was nevertheless, IMHO, a brilliant film), Gibson’s version could have provided a broader scope, exploring interstellar politics, biotechnological ethics, and the complexities of human and alien interaction. While Fincher's film has gained appreciation over time for its atmospheric and stylistic contributions to the franchise, Gibson's unproduced screenplay remains a fascinating "what if" scenario that hints at a different direction the "Alien" saga could have taken, potentially offering a more direct continuation of the themes and characters that fans had grown to love in the first two films.

Tuesday, February 06, 2024

Tolkien's Paradoxical Stance: A Deep Dive into His Love and Aversion for the Roman Empire

J.R.R. Tolkien remains a figure of intriguing complexity, and in some cases contradiction. As a devout Roman Catholic and a lover of Roman languages, Tolkien's aversion to the Roman Empire stands out as a remarkable paradox. As one explores Tolkien's complex relationship with the Roman Empire and its influence on his work, one cannot deny his deep-seated values of localism and traditionalism.

In Tolkien's Middle-earth, we find a reflection of his ideological battle—a world where the preservation of diversity stands as a testament to the resilience of local cultures against the tides of conquest and cultural erasure.

Tolkien's Ideological Conflict

At the heart of Tolkien's paradoxical stance is his deep admiration for the Roman people and their culture juxtaposed with his disdain for the Roman Empire. This aversion did not stem from a dislike of Roman achievements in engineering, governance, or the arts, but from the empire's approach to conquest and cultural eradication. Tolkien, despite his affection for Latin and Roman Catholicism, viewed the empire as antithetical to his cherished principles of localism and traditionalism.

Influence of the Roman Empire on Tolkien's Work

The shadow of the Roman Empire looms subtly over Tolkien's Middle-earth, with the city of Minas Tirith drawing inspiration from the historical Constantinople and themes of decline echoing the fall of ancient civilizations. However, Tolkien's engagement with these inspirations does not translate into an outright admiration for the empire's historical actions. Instead, he repurposes elements of Roman history and mythology to enrich his fictional world, all the while embedding a critique of imperialism and cultural homogenization.

A Champion of Localism and Traditionalism

Tolkien's ideology was profoundly rooted in a love for England, a preference for localized, distinct cultures, and languages. His opposition to the Roman Empire's empire-building and suppression of local traditions stems from this deep-seated belief. Through his writings and personal letters, Tolkien consistently advocated for the preservation of local customs, languages, and independence, opposing any form of imperialism that threatened these values. His narrative worlds are testament to his belief in the coexistence of diverse cultures and the preservation of their unique identities.

Reflecting Ideals Through Middle-earth

Middle-earth serves as a canvas for Tolkien to articulate his ideals. The coexistence of distinct cultures, languages, and traditions within Middle-earth mirrors Tolkien's opposition to the homogenizing force of empires. Characters and societies in his work often face threats from forces seeking to dominate and erase diversity, reflecting Tolkien's critique of imperialism. Through his fictional narratives, Tolkien advocates for a world where diversity is not only preserved but celebrated.

Latin, Catholicism, and Cultural Unity

Tolkien's advocacy for the use of Latin in Catholic services might seem contradictory to his localist views at first glance. However, Tolkien saw Latin as a unifying element of the Catholic Church, one that connected its history to the present without undermining local languages and cultures. His stance is a nuanced one that distinguishes between cultural appreciation and political dominion. For Tolkien, Latin represented a spiritual and cultural heritage that transcended the political ambitions of the Roman Empire, aligning with his vision of a world united in diversity rather than uniformity.


Tolkien's paradoxical stance on the Roman Empire reflects a complex interplay of admiration and aversion, deeply intertwined with his values and beliefs. His work, while drawing some inspiration from Roman history and mythology, serves as a critique of imperialism and a celebration of localism and traditionalism. In Tolkien's Middle-earth, we find a reflection of his ideological battle—a world where the preservation of diversity stands as a testament to the resilience of local cultures against the tides of conquest and cultural erasure. Through his unique perspective, Tolkien challenges us to appreciate the nuances of cultural heritage and the importance of preserving diversity in our increasingly globalized world.

Further readings: